• DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Teilen

Folgen

Framework of aftershock fragility assessment-case studies: older California reinforced concrete building frames

  1. USGS Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli Turkey, earthquake 2000
  2. Decanini LD Liberatore D Liberatore L Sorrentino L Preliminary report on the 2012 2012 .
  3. Li Q Mathematical formulation of tools for assessment of fragility and vulnerability of damaged buildings
  4. Bazzurro P Cornell CA Menun C Motahari M Luco N Advanced seismic assessment guidelines 2006
  5. Ryu H Luco N Uma SR Liel AB Developing fragilities for mainshock-damaged structures through incremental dynamic analysis 2011
  6. Uma SR Ryu H Luco N Liel AB Raghunandan M Comparison of main-shock and aftershock fragility curves developed for New Zealand and US buildings 2011
  7. Luco N Bazzurro P Cornell CA Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock 2004
  8. Raghunandan, Meera / Liel, Abbie B. / Luco, Nicolas (2015): Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 44, n. 3 (9 Januar 2015), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2478

  9. Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios / Cornell, C. Allin (2006): Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 35, n. 9 ( 2006), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.573

  10. Cornell, C. Allin / Jalayer, Fatemeh / Hamburger, Ronald O. / Foutch, Douglas A. (2002): Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines. In: Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), v. 128, n. 4 (April 2002), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)

  11. Ellingwood, Bruce R. / Celik, Ozan Cem / Kinali, Kursat (2007): Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 36, n. 13 ( 2007), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.693

  12. Jeon, Jong-Su / Lowes, Laura N. / DesRoches, Reginald / Brilakis, Ioannis (2015): Fragility curves for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames that exhibit different component response mechanisms. In: Engineering Structures, v. 85 (Februar 2015), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.009

  13. Liel AB Assessing the collapse risk of California's existing reinforced concrete frame structures: metrics for seismic safety decisions 2008
  14. International Conference of Building Officials Uniform building code 1967
  15. Mander, J. B. / Priestley, M. J. N. / Park, R. (1988): Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete. In: Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), v. 114, n. 8 (September 1988), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)

  16. Healy JJ Wu ST Murga M Structural building response review 1980
  17. Walker S Seismic performance of existing RC beam-column joint 2001
  18. Baker JW Shahi SK Jayaram N New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER Transportation Research Program 2011
  19. Giovenale, Paolo / Cornell, C. Allin / Esteva, Luis (2004): Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 33, n. 8 (11 Juni 2004), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.386

  20. Padgett, Jamie E. / Nielson, Bryant G. / DesRoches, Reginald (2008): Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 37, n. 5 ( 2008), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782

  21. Jeon, Jong-Su / Park, Ji-Hun / DesRoches, Reginald (2015): Seismic fragility of lightly reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, v. 44, n. 11 (12 März 2015), S. .

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2555

  22. Jeon J-S Aftershock vulnerability assessment of damaged reinforced concrete buildings in California 2013

Anzeige

  • Über diese
    Datenseite
  • Reference-ID
    10090793
  • Erstellt am
    11.12.2018
  • Geändert am
    11.12.2018