0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Internationale Datenbank und Galerie für Ingenieurbauwerke

Anzeige

Comparison of Alternative Floater concepts for a 2-span Suspension Bridge supported by a Tension Leg Platform

 Comparison of Alternative Floater concepts for a 2-span Suspension Bridge supported by a Tension Leg Platform
Autor(en): , , , ,
Beitrag für IABSE Congress: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, 21-23 September 2016, veröffentlicht in , S. 2631-2638
DOI: 10.2749/stockholm.2016.2630
Preis: € 25,00 inkl. MwSt. als PDF-Dokument  
ZUM EINKAUFSWAGEN HINZUFÜGEN
Vorschau herunterladen (PDF-Datei) 0.26 MB

As part of the E39 fjord crossing project The Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) performs a feasibility study of crossing the 2000m wide and 500m deep Halsafjord with a fixed link. One po...
Weiterlesen

Bibliografische Angaben

Autor(en): (Bentley Systems Austria, Graz, Austria)
(Bentley Systems Austria, Graz, Austria)
(TDA COWI AS, Oslo, Norway)
(TDA COWI AS, Oslo, Norway)
(Norwegian Public Roads Administration, Oslo, Norway)
(Norwegian Public Roads Administration, Oslo, Norway)
Medium: Tagungsbeitrag
Sprache(n): Englisch
Tagung: IABSE Congress: Challenges in Design and Construction of an Innovative and Sustainable Built Environment, Stockholm, Sweden, 21-23 September 2016
Veröffentlicht in:
Seite(n): 2631-2638 Anzahl der Seiten (im PDF): 8
Seite(n): 2631-2638
Anzahl der Seiten (im PDF): 8
Jahr: 2016
DOI: 10.2749/stockholm.2016.2630
Abstrakt:

As part of the E39 fjord crossing project The Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) performs a feasibility study of crossing the 2000m wide and 500m deep Halsafjord with a fixed link. One possible crossing alternative is a two span suspension bridge supported by a Tension Leg Platform (TLP) mid-fjord. The TLP technology is adopted from the offshore industry where it has been proven to be an effective concept for floating constructions at large water depths. Two floater concepts, a 4-legged steel floater and a monoleg concrete floater with a large submerged disk, are considered. The two floater concepts have similar stiffness properties, but large difference in inertia and shape. The structural response in a severe storm is calculated for the bridge subject to wind, wave and current forces, comparing the motion behaviour of the two floater concepts. Analyses are performed in time domain in software package RM Bridge, taking hydrodynamic, hydrostatic and aerodynamic load effects into account.

Stichwörter:
Hängebrücke Aerodynamik